The match between
Najdorf and
Kotov in round 11 of the Zurich International Chess Tournament of 1953, was a little odd since most of these games are Queen pawn ( mostly consisting of
QGD) games and those that had 1.e4 were
Sicilians. But this game in particular was the only Caro-
Kann.
Bronstein narrates that
Najdorf was anticipating
Kotov to play into a Sicilian (
Najdorf variation) but was surprised to see the c6 response.
As I traveled back in time, trying to imagine what the eleventh round would have been like at this event, I imagined I was looking over the shoulder of these two players. Early on, I looked at moves like 7.
Bd3 and how
Kotov DIDN'T exchange the bishops. Something I would have done. Since, its a pain in the ass in C-K and an opportunity to exchange for White's King side Maurader, I always tend to welcome ( to a fault).Rather, A couple moves later, AFTER he castled short, White decides to exchange.
Bronstein commented later that the pawn majority on
Kotov's King side versus the Q-side pawn majority of
Najdorf's meant a better end game for white and how the queen exchange was not a good plan for black. I have to agree. However, had Black exchanged bishops on move 7 instead of weakening the
kingside pawns ( or even by move 10 prior to castling) might the situation had been better. Then the queen exchange might have worked.
I'm open for some ideas on this one.